Cycles
Clomixyl Post Cycle Therapy
Clomixyl, or Clomiphene Citrate, has become a staple in the world of post cycle therapy (PCT) for anabolic steroid users.
Although once through the patent, a number of generic versions have become available, it’s original brand name stands out as being the go-to for many athletic performance enhancement protocols (APEP).
APEPs are designed to reduce the risks associated with anabolic/androgenic steroid (AAS) use, although the purpose of Clomixyl in a comprehensive protocol is to restore one’s rather delicate endocrine system back to balance post cycle.
Upon completion of an anabolic steroid cycle, one’s body is still in a state of hormonal confusion due, mainly, to the sudden termination of their regular anabolic steroid supply.
Consequently, the body has not reached homeostasis post cycle yet, assuming Clomixyl therapy follows cycle use appropriately, Clomixyl can effectively restore control of endogenous testosterone production back to the client.
Depending on the length of the steroid cycle, Clomixyl is most frequently administered between 2-4 weeks post cycle.
Examples of dosages (per day) during this time frame range from only25mg than the desired hormonal outcome is realized, the Clomixyl application is suspended.
The ingestion of Clomixyl has become such a widely accepted practice in the often underground world of anabolic steroid use that even some medical professionals in traditionally conservative U.S. neighborhoods have begun to recommend it’s use.
Apart from any PCT objectives, Clomixyl may also be utilized as an effective tool in enhancing sperm count.
As both male and female fertility can be significantly affected by anabolic-androgenic steroid use, restoration of viable sperm levels is vital for some instances.
Obviously, particularly in feminized male individuals, the recovery of healthy testes is paramount if fertility and/or full physical health is to be restored.
Clomixyl has become the cornerstone of performance induced recovery in so many athletes and bodybuilders in the past that medical professionals could find themselves obligated to re-evaluate its widespread use from the standpoint of severity and safety.